Also in Türkçe · Español

FinCEN has permanently ended beneficial ownership reporting for companies formed in the United States. If any entity in your structure was formed abroad, the obligation did not end for you.

What the rule actually did

On August 11, 2026, FinCEN announced a final rule titled “Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirement Revision” (FR Doc. 2026-16576, 91 FR 52508, RIN 1506-AB67). It was published in the Federal Register on August 14, 2026 and took effect the same day. There is no phase-in, no transition window and no grandfathering to argue about. As of that date, this rule is what governs your reporting obligation.

It does three things. First, it permanently exempts domestic reporting companies from beneficial ownership information reporting. Second, it exempts reporting companies from reporting beneficial ownership information for U.S.-person beneficial owners and company applicants — an exemption written around the person rather than the entity, which is precisely why it still matters to entities that continue to file. Third, it relieves U.S. persons of any obligation to update or correct submissions already made. If you filed in 2024 or 2025 and something has since changed — a new address, a transferred membership interest, a date of birth entered wrong — you are not required to go back and fix it.

For the overwhelming majority of companies in this country, that is the entire story. A Maryland LLC, a Delaware corporation, a Virginia partnership formed by filing with a U.S. secretary of state: finished, permanently, with nothing left on the calendar.

The carve-out most of the coverage buries

The rule did not end beneficial ownership reporting. It ended it for domestic companies. A foreign entity that is a reporting company — an entity formed under the law of a foreign country that has registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction — must still report beneficial ownership information for its foreign, non-U.S.-person beneficial owners.

Read that twice, because two conditions have to line up before it bites and both are easy to misjudge from memory. The first is where the entity was formed: not where it operates, not where its bank sits, not where its owners live, but where the charter was issued. The second is whether it registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction. That registration is frequently done years earlier by an accountant or a corporate services provider, for a reason nobody currently in the room remembers.

A third question sits on top of those two, and it is about people rather than entities: which beneficial owners are U.S. persons and which are not? The U.S.-person exemption strips those individuals out of the report. What remains — the foreign, non-U.S.-person beneficial owners — is what a foreign reporting company still has to report. A structure can therefore be half-reportable: the entity files, but only for some of the people behind it.

This is the exact shape of the structures we see most often. A founder in Istanbul or Bogotá sets up an operating company in Maryland and holds it through a company formed at home. A family office holds U.S. real estate through an offshore vehicle that was qualified to do business in a state so a closing could go through. The Maryland operating company is finished. The foreign parent, if it registered in a state, may not be.

If your company was formed in the United States, you are finished — permanently. If any entity on your chart was formed abroad and registered to do business in a U.S. state, you are not.

Who is NOT affected

If every entity in your structure was formed in the United States, none of the above reaches you. Domestic reporting companies are permanently exempt. No annual filing, no update obligation, no correction obligation, nothing to diarize.

If you are a U.S.-person beneficial owner or company applicant, you are out as well — out even of a report that some other entity still has to file. No reporting company has to report beneficial ownership information for you, and you are not required to update or correct anything you previously submitted.

A foreign entity that never registered to do business in any U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction is not a reporting company to begin with, and nothing in the August 14 rule changes that.

What none of this touches is the rest of your compliance stack. Tax filings, state annual reports, registered agent obligations, licensing and banking know-your-customer questionnaires are separate regimes with separate deadlines. A bank asking you for ownership information is asking under its own rules, not under this one.

What happens to what you already filed

FinCEN announced that it will delete previously reported U.S.-person information from the BOI database. That is the agency’s stated intention for data it already holds on U.S.-person beneficial owners and company applicants. It is a housekeeping commitment about government-held records, not a records instruction to you. Keep your own copies of what you filed and when. A filing confirmation is a cheap thing to hold and an awkward thing to reconstruct if a lender, a buyer or a bank asks about your compliance history two years from now.

The mail demanding a fee is a scam

FinCEN’s own beneficial ownership page carries a fraud warning, and it is worth repeating because the mailers are convincing. Fraudulent letters are circulating that demand payment to file a beneficial ownership report and that reference a “Form 4022” or a “Form 5102,” sent under the name “US Business Regulations Dept.” FinCEN states plainly that it does not have a “Form 4022” or a “Form 5102,” that there is no government entity by this name, and that there is no fee to file BOI directly with FinCEN.

These letters were circulating before August 14 and they have not stopped. A rule change is, if anything, the ideal cover story for one: the recipient half-remembers that something happened with beneficial ownership, and the letter supplies an urgent-sounding reason to pay. Do not pay. Do not enter company information on a website named in such a letter. Send it to your attorney or your accountant instead.

The litigation running in the background

The constitutional challenge to the Corporate Transparency Act has not gone away. According to press accounts, a petition for certiorari is reported to be pending for the Supreme Court’s fall 2026 term in National Small Business United v. Bessent, with a coalition of 25 states filing as amici to urge the Court to take the case. We flag this as reported rather than confirmed: we have not verified the docket ourselves, and for that reason we are not giving a docket number here.

Practically, it changes nothing about what you do this month. The August 14 rule is in effect now and governs now. Litigation over the statute could, in some future posture, move the ground under the whole regime in either direction. That is a reason to keep your structure documented and your counsel informed. It is not a reason to defer a filing that is currently due.

Map the structure once, then stop thinking about it

The practical work here is short and worth doing properly a single time. Pull the current organizational chart — not the one in your head, the one supported by formation documents. For every entity on it, write down the jurisdiction of formation and whether it has ever registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction. Then list the individuals who own or control it and mark each one as a U.S. person or not.

If nothing on the page was formed abroad, close the file. If something was, the next question is whether it registered in a state, and if it did, which of its beneficial owners are non-U.S. persons. That is the report that still exists. For most clients this is an hour of work that produces a permanent answer, which is a considerably better outcome than re-litigating the same uncertainty every year.

Key dates

What you should do now

• Pull the real entity chart. Work from formation documents and state registrations, not from recollection. The jurisdiction of formation is the fact that decides everything else.
• Flag every foreign-formed entity. For each one, confirm whether it has registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction. If it has, it is a reporting company and the August 14 rule did not release it.
• Classify the people, not just the companies. Mark each beneficial owner and company applicant as a U.S. person or a non-U.S. person. Only the foreign, non-U.S.-person owners of a foreign reporting company still have to be reported.
• Stop any pending U.S.-person cleanup. If someone on your team was preparing an update or correction covering U.S. persons, that work is no longer required.
• Keep your own filing records. FinCEN has said it will delete previously reported U.S.-person information from its database; that is its housekeeping, not your archive. Retain your confirmations.
• Do not pay anyone who mails you a bill. There is no fee to file BOI directly with FinCEN, and there is no “Form 4022,” no “Form 5102” and no “US Business Regulations Dept.”
• Watch the litigation without planning around it. The reported Supreme Court petition is worth monitoring, but the rule in force today is the one that governs today.

Sources: FinCEN news release · Federal Register, 91 FR 52508 (FR Doc. 2026-16576) · FinCEN beneficial ownership information page.

This article is general information about the FinCEN final rule “Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirement Revision” (FR Doc. 2026-16576, 91 FR 52508, RIN 1506-AB67), published and effective August 14, 2026. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Supreme Court petition described above is reported by press accounts and has not been independently confirmed by this firm. Content is current as of August 29, 2026. Sources: https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-permanently-ends-beneficial-ownership-reporting-requirements-millions · https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/14/2026-16576 · https://www.fincen.gov/boi

Ozek Law Firm, LLC · 4500 East West Highway, Suite 150, Bethesda, MD 20814 · +1 (202) 854-8545 · info@ozeklaw.com · www.ozeklaw.com
Consultations in English, Turkish, Spanish.